General Comments
1860-O is one of the two most-available dates in the Liberty Seated dollar series (the other is
1859-O), not because their mintages are the highest, but because of the release of coins from the
treasury hoard in the early 1960’s. Dave Bowers cites many estimates of the coins released
(reference 4). We can summarize the situation by saying that as many as 7,000 1860-O coins were
released, and that the ratio of 1860-O dated coins to those of 1859-O is about 2:1. Additionally
Dave relates several stories of releases of roll or bag quantities earlier in the 20th century,
prior to the larger treasury release. Most of the coins released in the 20th century had been
kept in bags for nearly 100 years, so the average mint state grade is low. Very few coins from
the treasury hoard reached even the MS63 level. As a result, mint state examples are extremely
common, but very choice and gem coins (MS64 and above) are very rare. We estimate that
approximately 10,000 examples exist today in all grades, and that as many as 7,000 of these came
from treasury releases in the 20th century.
Very choice and gem coins are nearly as rare as most other dates in the series. The finest known
are three MS66 examples, all graded by NGC. Another 17 coins have received a MS65 grade, 9 at
PCGS and 8 at NGC. Three of the PCGS coins received a MS65+ and are the finest graded by that
service. An additional 66 coins have received a MS64 grade, 31 at PCGS, 33 at NGC, and 2 at
CACG. Three of the PCGS coins were graded MS64+, while six of the NGC examples reached that
level. Several of these coins are almost certainly re-submissions, trying to get one of the MS65
coins upgraded to join the “finest known” list, or a MS64 moved up to the gem category.
Population statistics are as of February, 2025.
|
 |
Mintage | 515,000 |
Proof mintage | None |
Mintage ranking | 45th |
Finest known | MS66 |
Known obverse dies | 4 |
Known reverse dies | 6 |
Known die marriages | 10 |
Most common die marriage | OC-2/ R1 |
Rarest die marriage | OC-10/ R3+ |
| |
Below MS64 the population explodes. Over 1300 coins have been graded in the MS60-MS63 range. As noted,
many of these are heavily bag-marked and therefore not particularly attractive. But if you want a
NO MOTTO type coin at the lowest possible price 1859-O and 1860-O are the years to go after. You’ll have
a wide range of choices at any large coin show, and the strikes are usually better than average.
As noted above 1860-O examples are usually well struck. In fact, if strike is one of your strong interests,
this and the 1859-O are among the best dates in the series for finding examples that are sharply struck.
It seems to be the rule rather than the exception. I’ve seen a few examples that display softness on the
right-side stars, including several MS64 and MS65 coins, but it’s almost tougher to find a coin that displays
a weak strike than to find one that’s well-defined. Similarly, I’ve seen a few that show some flatness on
the eagle’s left talon, but only a few. This is one of the few dates that almost never shows weakness on the
upper left edge of the eagle’s wing. They may be common, but at least you can find them well struck!
1860-O surfaces are usually frosty. They can be found prooflike, but with a large mintage spread among the
ten die pairs identified so far, the runs were long enough that most of the coins exhibit frosty surfaces.
1860-O Die Marriages
Four obverse dies were paired with six reverses to strike a total of ten die marriages. None are particularly
rare, with the OC-10 at R3+ and 3 others at R3 being the scarcest. The rest can be considered common. The
following table summarizes the known die marriages:
Click the links below to view the details of the die marriages.
Die Marriage |
Rarity |
Obverse Die |
Reverse Die |
Estimated Survivors |
OC-1 |
R1 | 1 | 1859-O B | 1400 |
OC-2 |
R1 | 2 | 1859-O B | 3100 |
OC-3 |
R3 | 2 | A | 350 |
OC-4 |
R2 | 2 | B | 730 |
OC-5 |
R3 | 2 | C | 330 |
OC-6 |
R2 | 3 | D | 1000 |
OC-7 |
R2 | 3 | E | 790 |
OC-8 |
R1 | 4 | D | 1750 |
OC-9 |
R3 | 4 | C | 320 |
OC-10 |
R3+ | 2 | E | 230 |
1860-O Varieties
The only die marriage that I consider a true variety is the early state of OC-2. It exhibits a repunched
date. A photo of this repunching is included with the detailed description of OC-2 found later in this
section. The repunching is very minor. I didn’t feel that this variety was significant enough to be
included in my Top-30 list.
Breen (reference 20) lists three varieties:
- BR5464, heavy numerals;
- BR5465, very thin numerals, heavy mintmark;
- BR5466, very thin numerals, light mintmark.
I believe that all three of the Breen varieties are simply die states created by die polishing.
Light mintmarks are OC-1 and OC-2, which used a reverse die first used in 1859 and polished several
times before its use in 1860; and OC-8, in a late reverse die state. Light numerals are OC-8 and OC-9.
Obverse 4 was heavily polished during the striking of the OC-8 die marriage, creating a date that
appears slightly weak. Reverse C was also heavily polished at that time, weakening ONE DOL at the
base of the reverse. However, the mintmark was not significantly affected, and remained bold.
The remaining die marriages were less polished and would be considered as Breen’s heavy numeralss noted.
1860-O Emission Sequence
1860-O dies were used long enough to allow conclusive determination of the emission sequence. Only the placements
of OC-7 and OC-8 are arbitrary, as noted.
Emission Order |
Die Marriage |
Comments |
1 | OC-1 | We assumed that the marriages which used the transitional reverse die came first. |
2 | OC-2 | Advancing reverse die cracks established OC-2 as following OC-1. |
3 | OC-3 | Slight additional Obverse 2 die polish indicates that OC-3 followed OC-2. |
4 | OC-4 | Slight additional Obverse 2 die polish indicates that OC-4 followed OC-3. |
5 | OC-5 | Slight additional Obverse 2 die polish indicates that OC-5 followed OC-4. |
6 | OC-6 | No shared dies with OC-5, but we know that OC-7, OC-8, and OC-9 followed OC-6, and that OC-9 followed OC-5. |
7 | OC-7 | Slight additional Obverse 3 die polish indicates the OC-7 followed OC-6.
The placement of OC-7 before OC-8 is arbitrary. |
8 | OC-10 | Growth of Reverse E die cracks indicates that OC-10 followed OC-7.
The placement of OC-10 before OC-8 is arbitrary. |
9 | OC-8 | Reverse D die deterioration indicates that OC-8 followed OC-6.
The placement of OC-8 after OC-7 and OC-10 is arbitrary. |
10 | OC-9 | Obverse 4 die wear indicates that OC-9 followed OC-8.
Reverse C die cracks indicate that OC-9 followed OC-5. |
1860-O Quick Finder Chart
Several 1860-O dies are similar, but in all cases there are notable markers that allow relatively easy attribution.
Die Marriage |
Obv Die |
Rev Die |
Right Base of 1 |
Keys |
OC-1 | 1 | 1859-O B | RE |
Obverse: Finished under the chin. 1 is VSL.
Reverse: A tiny lump at the top of the first shield recess. Other markers at the top of recesses #2 and #3.
Most examples exhibit a radial die crack through the right side of T2.
|
OC-2 | 2 | 1859-O B | B |
Obverse: RB of 1 is B. 1 is SH. The date slants VS down. A circular die line on Miss Liberty's stomach.
Reverse: A tiny die pit at the top of the first shield recess. Other markers at the top of recesses #2 and #3.
All examples of this die marriage exhibit a radial die crack through the right side of T2 and a crack crossing the base of D STATES OF.
|
OC-3 | 2 | A | B |
Obverse: RB of 1 is B. 1 is SH. The date slants VS down. A circular die line on Miss Liberty's stomach.
Reverse: Vertical shield line 1-2 extends sharply to 4. Mintmark high, closer to stem, CCW rotation. Die rust lumps around ES.
|
OC-4 | 2 | B | B |
Obverse: RB of 1 is B. 1 is SH. The date slants VS down. A circular die line on Miss Liberty's stomach.
Reverse: Shield recesses rusty, unfinished except for the upper left quadrant. Tiny die line within left claw.
|
OC-5 | 2 | C | B |
Obverse: RB of 1 is B. 1 is SH. The date slants VS down. A circular die line on Miss Liberty's stomach.
Reverse: Mintmark centered vertically, farthest left for the year. Die lines in shield recesses.
| OC-6 | 3 | D | JL of C |
Obverse: 1 is VSH, 0 is VSL. No other markers.
Reverse: Mintmark is very high, slightly closer to stem.
| OC-7 | 3 | E | JL of C |
Obverse: 1 is VSH, 0 is VSL. No other markers.
Reverse: Mintmark slightly high, much closer to stem, no rotation. No other notable markers.
| OC-8 | 4 | D | JL of C |
Obverse: 1 and 0 are SH. On almost all examples a tine slants up and left off the upper left side of the scroll end.
Reverse: Mintmark very high, slightly closer to stem.
| OC-9 | 4 | C | JL of C |
Obverse: 1 and 0 are SH. Tine slants up to the left off the upper left side of the scroll end.
Reverse: Mintmark centered vertically, farthest left for the year. Die lines in shield recesses.
| OC-10 | 2 | E | B |
Obverse: RB of 1 is B. 1 is SH. The date slants VS down. A circular die line on Miss Liberty's stomach.
Reverse: Mintmark slightly high, much closer to stem, no rotation. No other notable markers.
|
1860-O Attribution Flow Chart
The flow chart shown below can be helpful in attaining a quick attribution of your 1860-O examples.


Photo credits:
Obverse and reverse full photos:   1860-O PCGS MS65+ CAC, from the Heritage archives.
|
|