General Comments
1841 is a common date in the Liberty Seated dollar series, with a mintage ranking of 37th out of 47.
Examples are easy to locate in virtually any grade desired. They only become rare in choice to
gem BU, MS63 or better.
The finest known business strike is a single MS65+ graded by PCGS. Two coins have been graded MS65,
one by PCGS and one by NGC. Eleven additional coins have been graded MS64, seven by PCGS (two of
these MS64+) and four by NGC. A few of these almost certainly represent re-submissions. A total
of 124 coins have been graded in all mint state grades. Population statistics are as of April, 2025..
In proof format, this date is a classic rarity. The finest known proof is a single PR64 example graded
by PCGS, the Pittman-Gardner coin, sold by Heritage as part of the Gardner Collection on April 25, 2013.
It crossed the block again in Heritage auctions on October 27, 2014, and March 3, 2025. Five additional
coins have been graded PR63, one by PCGS, four by NGC. One of the NGC coins was evaluated as PR63+. One
of the four coins graded as proofs by NGC is my die marriage OC-4. This coin was sold by Stacks-Bowers
during Rarities Night of their 2017 Summer ANA sale. The catalog states: “The fact that the present
example was struck from a different die than the other known survivors supports the linked theories of
multiple striking periods, and the distribution of some coins individually.” The coin is very well struck
for an 1841, leading me to concur that their explanation is possibly factual. However, other factors,
most notably the rim cuds that are visible below the date, lead me to believe that this coin is a very
prooflike business strike. I don’t believe that dies with such a notable rim defect would have been
acceptable for striking proofs. Thus, it’s likely that no more than 6 true proofs are currently known.
One of these, a low-grade example in an ICG VG8 holder, was discovered only recently. It was shown
to me at the 2020 Winter FUN show. The collector who found it had used my book to identify the die
marriage. He brought it to the show to confirm the attribution. After viewing his coin I was able to
tell him that he had found only the 6th known example of a 1841 proof dollar.
|
 |
| Mintage | 173,000 |
| Proof mintage | 10 estimated |
| Mintage ranking | 37th |
| Finest known | MS65+ PR64 |
| Known obverse dies | 3 |
| Known reverse dies | 4 |
| Known die marriages | 6 (including one re-marriage) |
| Most common die marriage | OC-2/ R1 |
| Rarest business strike die marriage | OC-1/ R3+ OC-1a/R3+ |
| Rarest proof die marriage | OC-P1 / R7- |
| |
1841 business strikes are often weakly struck, displaying softness on the hair detail. Stars are usually
reasonably well struck, with occasional softness on the centrals. The upper left wing is very often weak.
The most common die marriage, OC-2, is almost always very weakly struck, with the weakness particularly
notable on the upper edge of the left wing. I can’t recall seeing an example that displayed a full strike
on both sides.
High-grade business strikes are sometimes prooflike, but more often frosty. With high mintage, only four
business strike die pairings, and only two business strike obverse dies, the dies wore sufficiently to
eliminate prooflike surfaces for most examples. Nice prooflike examples can be located with patient searching.
1841 Die Marriages
6 die marriages have been positively identified. Two obverse dies were paired with 3 reverse dies, one
transitional from 1840, to strike five business strike die pairs. One of these was a re-marriage of Obverse
1 and Reverse 1840 A. None of the business strike dies were used for proofs. A second re-marriage of die
pair 1-1840 A exists, since both OC-1 and OC-2 are found with reverse die state d, but with no differences
in intermediate states other than die polishing it’s impossible to say for sure exactly where in the sequence
it occurred.
I’ve identified only a single proof die marriage (see the previous section for a possible exception).
It combines a unique obverse die with the reverse die used for almost all original proofs through 1854.
The table below summarizes the known die marriages for 1841. Breen lists a “small stars” proof, Breen 5427.
I haven’t noted any significant difference in the size of the stars. However, since I’ve identified only
one proof die marriage, it’s not really an issue.
Click the links below to view the details of each die marriage.
Die Marriage |
Rarity |
Obverse Die |
Reverse Die |
Estimated Survivors |
| OC-1 |
R3+ | 1 | 1840 A | 275 |
| OC-1a |
R3+ | 1 | 1840 A | 285 |
| OC-2 |
R1 | 1 | A | 1800 |
| OC-3 |
R1 | 2 | 1840 A | 1250 |
| OC-4 |
R1 | 2 | B | 1640 |
| OC-P1 |
R7- | P1 | 1840 PA | 10 |
1841 Business Strike Emission Sequence
The obverse die sequences were easily determined due to die polishing and rim cuds on
later states of obverse 1 and rim cuds on the late state of obverse 2.
Emission Order |
Die Marriage/ Obv-Rev Dies |
Comments |
| 1 | OC-1 1 - 1840 A | The earliest state of Obverse 1 exhibits repunching on the 4. |
| 2 | OC-2 1 - A | Early state examples retain the repunching on the 4.
In later states the die was polished, removing evidence of the repunching, indicating that OC-2 was issued after OC-1. |
| 1 | OC-1a 1 - 1840 A | In its latest state die marriage 1-1840A exhibits
state d of Obverse 1, with minor rim cuds. This indicates that some examples of the marriage were struck after die marriage 1-A. |
| 3 | OC-3 2 - 1840 A | A greater extent of die polishing on Reverse 1840 A indicates that
OC-3 was issued after OC-1a. |
| 4 | OC-4 2 - B | Rim cuds below date in the latest die state indicate that OC-4 was
issued after OC-3. |
1841 Proof Emission Sequence
With only a single proof die marriage identified the emission sequence is simple.
Emission Order |
Die Marriage/ Obv-Rev Dies |
Comments |
| 1 | OC-P1 P1 - 1840 PA | No other proof die marriages have been identified. |
1841 Quick Finder Chart
Notably different date placement makes the 3 obverse dies easy to identify. The reverse differences are
subtle, but attribution should be easy for any examples grading F12 or better. The steps that lead to
quick attribution are as follows: First use the date placement to identify the obverse die. Each obverse
is paired with just two reverses (only one for the proof). Next review the die markers that characterize
the reverses paired with your obverse. Finally use these markers to identify the reverse, and thus the
die marriage. If the determination is OC-1 use the obverse die state to determine whether it’s OC-1 or
OC-1a. None of the business strike die marriages are particularly rare, so only those collectors wishing
to assemble a die marriage set need to worry about attribution.
Die Marriage |
Obv. Die |
Rev. Die |
Right Base of 1 |
Keys to Identification |
| OC-1 | 1 | 1840 A | L QTR |
Obverse - Right date, 5-4.0. Repunched 4. Light die lines extend down to the right from the lower right edge of the shield.
Reverse - Vertical shield line 3-3 extends through the inside shield border.
|
| OC-1a | 1 | 1840 A | L QTR |
Obverse - Right date, 5-4.0. Repunched 4. Light die lines extend down to the right from the lower right edge of the shield.
Obverse die state b or later
Reverse - Vertical shield line 3-3 extends through the inside shield border.
| | OC-2 | 1 | A | L QTR |
Obverse - Right date, 5-4.0. Light die lines from shield still visible. Repunched 4 gone.
Reverse - Vertical shield line 1-2 extends into the horizontal lines to line 5.
|
| OC-3 | 2 | 1840 A | B |
Obverse - Left date, 4-4.5. Die lines slant down to the right above the leg, left of the pole base.
Reverse - Vertical shield line 3-3 extends through the inside shield border.
|
| OC-4 | 2 | B | B |
Obverse - Left date, 4-4.5. Die lines slant down to the right above the leg, left of the pole.
Reverse - A faint die line visible in shield recesses 3 and 4, extending across the vertical shield lines, just above the middle of the recesses.
|
| OC-P1 | P1 | 1840 PA | C |
Obverse - A tiny but strong die dot in the gown just above and left of the pole.
Reverse - Defects on A3.
|
|